我们提供基站发和实卡发的国际短信群发服务，We provide MMS service! 两者有何异同应该如何选择？
国际短信和彩信群发，对于出海业务的重要性不言而喻：(14)我们提供国内外短信彩信群发顶级通道，突破批量发送灰产、五类、擦边、成人的限制，真正实现“免审发送”的国际短信和彩信群发服务！
实现国际短信和彩信群发有不同的技术路径，实卡发和基站发是比较常见的解决方案。我们|飞机号: t.me/bulk006|接下来比较这两种群发方式的异同点，帮助出海营销人员对我们的服务有更加清晰的了解。
基站发 (jī zhàn fā)：我们提供国际短信群发的"基站发" ，和实卡发 (shí kǎ fā)：我们提供MMS“实卡发”国际短信群发服务 ，是两种不同的大量发送 MMS 消息的方法，特别是在中国出海项目中使用场景不尽相同。虽然这两种方法都是用于大量发送 MMS 消息，但它们在技术、优势和使用场景方面有明显的区别。
基站发 (jī zhàn fā)
基站发 是一种使用网关或聚合器将 MMS 消息发送到多个移动网络运营商的 SMSC/MMSC 的方法。该网关或聚合器通常由专门从事 SMS/MMS 服务的第三方公司运营。以下是基站发 的一些关键特征：
网关式：基站发 使用网关或聚合器连接到多个移动网络运营商的 SMSC/MMSC。
高容量：基站发 可以处理大量 MMS 消息，是高容量发送者的不二之选。
快速可靠：基站发 一般来说是更快和更可靠的，具有较高的投递率和较少的技术问题。
可扩展：基站发 可以轻松地扩展或缩减以满足不断变化的需求。
实卡发 (shí kǎ fā)
实卡发 则是一种使用物理 SIM 卡安装在移动电话或专门设备中，将 MMS 消息发送到目标接收者的方法。该 SIM 卡连接到计算机或服务器，用于发送 MMS 消息。以下是实卡发 的一些关键特征：
SIM 卡式：实卡发 使用物理 SIM 卡发送 MMS 消息。
较低容量：实卡发 的消息发送容量通常较低，适合小型发送者。
技术问题：实卡发 可能会遇到技术问题，例如 SIM 卡兼容性问题或软件故障。
成本效益：实卡发 可以是一种成本效益的方法，用于大量发送 MMS 消息，特别是在小型发送者中。
关键差异
以下是基站发 和实卡发 之间的主要区别：
技术：基站发 使用网关或聚合器，而实卡发 使用物理 SIM 卡。
容量：基站发 的消息发送容量通常较高。
可靠性：基站发 一般来说是更快速和可靠的。
成本：实卡发 可以是一种成本效益的方法，用于小型发送者，而基站发 更适合高容量发送者。
总之，基站发 是一种更可扩展、可靠和高容量的大量发送 MMS 消息的方法，而实卡发 是一种成本效益的方法，适合小型发送者。选择这两种方法取决于发送者的具体需求和要求。 📱💻
😊
基站发 (jī zhàn fā) and 实卡发 (shí kǎ fā) are two different methods of sending MMS messages in bulk, especially in China. While both methods are used for bulk sending MMS messages, they have distinct differences in terms of their underlying technology, advantages, and use cases.
基站发 (jī zhàn fā)
基站发 is a method of sending MMS messages in bulk using a gateway or aggregator that connects to multiple mobile network operators' SMSC/MMSC (Short Message Service Center/Multimedia Messaging Service Center) directly. This gateway or aggregator is typically operated by a third-party company that specializes in SMS/MMS services.
Here are some key characteristics of 基站发:
Gateway-based: 基站发 uses a gateway or aggregator to connect to multiple mobile network operators' SMSC/MMSC.
High-capacity: 基站发 can handle large volumes of MMS messages and is suitable for high-volume senders.
Fast and reliable: 基站发 is generally faster and more reliable than 实卡发, with higher delivery rates and fewer technical issues.
Scalable: 基站发 can be easily scaled up or down to meet changing demands.
实卡发 (shí kǎ fā)
实卡发, on the other hand, is a method of sending MMS messages in bulk using a physical SIM card installed in a mobile phone or a specialized device. This SIM card is connected to a computer or server, which is used to send the MMS messages.
Here are some key characteristics of 实卡发:
SIM card-based: 实卡发 uses a physical SIM card to send MMS messages.
Lower capacity: 实卡发 typically has lower message sending capacities compared to 基站发.
Technical issues: 实卡发 may experience technical issues, such as SIM card compatibility problems or software glitches.
Cost-effective: 实卡发 can be a cost-effective way to send MMS messages in bulk, especially for smaller senders.
Key differences
Here are the main differences between 基站发 and 实卡发:
Technology: 基站发 uses a gateway or aggregator, while 实卡发 uses a physical SIM card.
Capacity: 基站发 has higher message sending capacities than 实卡发.
Reliability: 基站发 is generally more reliable and faster than 实卡发.
Cost: 实卡发 can be more cost-effective for smaller senders, while 基站发 is more suitable for high-volume senders.
In summary, 基站发 is a more scalable, reliable, and high-capacity method of sending MMS messages in bulk, while 实卡发 is a more cost-effective method suitable for smaller senders. The choice between the two methods depends on the specific needs and requirements of the sender. 📱💻
Here is the comparison table highlighting the differences and similarities between 实卡发 (shí kǎ fā, physical SIM card-based MMS sending) and 基站发 (jī zhàn fā, gateway-based MMS sending):
| 功能 | 实卡发 (Physical SIM Card-based MMS Sending) | 基站发 (Gateway-based MMS Sending) |
|---|---|---|
| SIM 卡 | 需要物理 SIM 卡安装在移动电话或设备中 | 不需要物理 SIM 卡 |
| 连接 | 移动电话或设备通过串行通信协议（例如 USB、蓝牙、Wi-Fi）连接到计算机或服务器 | 计算机或服务器通过基于 IP 的协议（例如 SMPP、HTTP）连接到网关或聚合器 |
| MMS 消息发送 | 移动电话或设备直接使用物理 SIM 卡将 MMS 消息发送到接收者 | 网关或聚合器代表发送者将 MMS 消息发送到接收者 |
| 消息提交 | 使用 AT 命令将消息提交到移动电话或设备 | 使用 API 或协议（例如 SMPP、HTTP）将消息提交到网关或聚合器 |
| 消息路由 | 消息从移动电话或设备直接路由到接收者的移动设备 | 消息从网关或聚合器路由到接收者的移动设备 |
| 可扩展性 | 受限于物理 SIM 卡数量和移动电话或设备的限制 | 可以处理大量的消息并可以根据需要扩展 |
| 可靠性 | 可能出现错误和消息丢失，因为移动电话或设备的限制 | 通常更加可靠和容错，因为网关或聚合器的基础设施 |
| 成本 | 对于小到中等规模的消息量可能是成本-effective | 对于大规模的消息量可能是成本-effective，因为可以根据需要扩展 |
| 安全 | 可能存在 SIM 卡克隆和其他安全风险 | 通常更加安全，因为网关或聚合器的安全措施 |
| 复杂度 | 可能需要复杂的设置和管理，特别是对于大规模的部署 | 通常更加容易设置和管理，因为网关或聚合器的基础设施 |
注意：该表格不是详尽的，具体的异同点可能会因实现和要求的不同而异。
Here is a comparison table highlighting the differences and similarities between 实卡发 (shí kǎ fā, physical SIM card-based MMS sending) and 基站发 (jī zhàn fā, gateway-based MMS sending):
| Feature | 实卡发 (Physical SIM Card-based MMS Sending) | 基站发 (Gateway-based MMS Sending) |
|---|---|---|
| SIM Card | Physical SIM card installed in a mobile phone or device | No physical SIM card required |
| Connection | Mobile phone or device connected to a computer or server via serial communication protocol (e.g. USB, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi) | Computer or server connected to a gateway or aggregator via IP-based protocol (e.g. SMPP, HTTP) |
| MMS Message Sending | Mobile phone or device sends MMS messages directly to recipients using the physical SIM card | Gateway or aggregator sends MMS messages to recipients on behalf of the sender |
| Message Submission | Messages submitted to mobile phone or device using AT commands | Messages submitted to gateway or aggregator using API or protocol (e.g. SMPP, HTTP) |
| Message Routing | Messages routed directly from mobile phone or device to recipient's mobile device | Messages routed through gateway or aggregator to recipient's mobile device |
| Scalability | Limited by the number of physical SIM cards and mobile phones or devices | Can handle large volumes of messages and scalable to meet high demand |
| Reliability | Can be prone to errors and message loss due to mobile phone or device limitations | Generally more reliable and fault-tolerant due to gateway or aggregator infrastructure |
| Cost | Can be cost-effective for small to medium-sized message volumes | Can be more cost-effective for large message volumes due to economies of scale |
| Security | May be vulnerable to SIM card cloning and other security risks | Typically more secure due to gateway or aggregator security measures |
| Complexity | Can be complex to set up and manage, especially for large-scale deployments | Generally easier to set up and manage due to gateway or aggregator infrastructure |
(15)我们提供国际短信通道发送彩信不限国家、不限行业、不限内容，低成本支持全球语言、可发送超链！
Note: This table is not exhaustive, and the specific differences and similarities may vary depending on the implementation and requirements of each solution.
如何联系此批量采集和群发服务商及工具开发者：如需邮件、RCS、国际短信、彩信群发代发，或者TikTok, KakaoTalk, Line, VK, Viber, LinkedIn, Telegram, Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp, X, Discord, Skype, SnapChat等媒体的群发或代发DM私信服务，可加此服务商的飞机号了解更多，他们的Telegram账号是：t.me/theoglo (Eng pls)
We are looking for agents to distribute our software & service worldwide, including CHINA！
